Prominent Dutch politician and outspoken critic of Islam, Geert Wilders, issued this dire warning:

We are facing a determined enemy who is striving through all means to destroy the West and snuff out our traditions of free thought, free speech, and freedom of religion. Make no mistake: if we fail, we will be enslaved.[40]

In most Muslim countries the people are subjected to the totalitarian socio-political doctrine that Islam calls sharia, under which women are repressed, and draconian laws prevail. Under sharia, polygamy, marital rape, wife abuse, female genital mutilation and underage forced marriages are rife.

Translated as “the path,” sharia is a comprehensive legal and political framework. Though it certainly has spiritual elements, it would be a mistake to think of sharia as a “religious” code in the Western sense because it seeks to regulate all manner of behavior in the secular sphere – economic, social, military, legal and political.

Sharia has been, for over a half-century, lavishly financed and propagated by Islamic regimes (particularly Saudi Arabia and Iran), through disciplined international organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).

The history of Islam is a history of invasion and conquest.

Over the past 1,400 years, the world has witnessed numerous Muslim crusades against non-Muslim countries, including Western countries.

The invasions began with Muhammad in the 7th century. He established control of the Arabian Peninsula which, under the subsequent Rashidun and Umayyad caliphates, saw a century of rapid expansion. The resulting empire stretched from the borders of China and India across central Asia, the Middle East and North Africa.

Although there were minor incursions, the first significant invasion of European territory occurred in the year 711 under the Muslim Berber commander Tariq ibn Ziyad. Stationed in Tangiers at the time, he crossed the straits with an army of Arabs and Berbers. After defeating the forces of King Roderic, Muslim forces advanced capturing cities of the Gothic kingdom, one after another. By 713 the Iberian Peninsula was almost entirely under Muslim control. Muslims remained in control until finally defeated by the armies of Ferdinand and Isabella in 1492.

The (Muslim) Ottoman Empire, also known as the Turkish Empire, was founded in 1299 by Oghuz Turks under Osman I. During the 14th and 15th centuries, the Ottoman Empire made numerous incursions into Eastern Europe, during which Hungary and Bulgaria were annexed. The Ottomans remained in Bulgaria for nearly 500 years.

The Ottomans continued on with their Muslim invasion of Europe pushing further west, culminating in the siege of Vienna, beginning on May 10, 1529. After weeks of fierce resistance by the Austrian forces, the Ottomans were defeated.

The last great push into Central Europe by the Ottomans occurred in 1683 in the battle of Vienna. The Ottomans laid siege to the city for two months. The Turks were finally defeated in the battle of Vienna due largely to the forces of King John III Sobieski of Poland, which arrived just in time to save Vienna.

The battle marked a turning point in the Muslim invasion of Europe, and the Turks were gradually pushed back over succeeding years as the Ottoman Empire diminished in influence.

The West owes a great debt of gratitude to John Sobieski.

Nothing more illustrates the savagery and barbarity of Muslims towards non-Muslim minorities living in a Muslim country than the Armenian Genocide early in the 20th century.[41] Under pressure from the advancing Russian army as it moved into eastern Anatolia during World War 1, the Ottoman government started the deportation of its ethnic Armenian population, which was predominantly Christian, resulting in the deaths of approximately 1.5 million Armenians.

The genocide was carried out during and after World War 1 and implemented in two phases: the wholesale killing of the able-bodied male population through massacre and subjection of army conscripts to forced labor, followed by the deportation of women, children and the elderly on death marches leading to the Syrian desert. Driven forward by military escorts, the deportees were deprived of food and water and subjected to periodic robbery, rape, and systematic massacre. Large-scale massacres were also committed against the empire’s Greek and Assyrian minorities as part of the same campaign of ethnic cleansing.[42]

Following setbacks in World War 1, and the Turkish War of Independence under the leadership of Mustafa Kemal, the Ottoman Empire, (and the last caliphate) was finally dissolved in in 1922.

The Hijra – Islamization by stealth

Most of the Muslim conquests prior to the 20th century utilized the Islamic concept of jihad – Islamization by the sword. Following the Ottoman setback, 20th-century Islamic leaders realized that to make inroads into militarily-powerful Western countries they needed to utilize the other great vehicle of Islamic conquest, the Hijra

The meaning of Al-Hijra is “to immigrate.” The Hijra was enshrined by Muhammad from the outset within Islam as the “Doctrine of Immigration,” or the “peaceful means of extending the Islamic political state garbed in religious terminology.”

Muhammad proclaimed to his followers what have become known as the five charges:

I charge you with five of what Allah has charged me with: to assemble, to listen, to obey, to immigrate and to wage Jihad for the sake of Allah.[43]

Hence Hijra, or immigration, is binding on all Muslims, as a religious obligation, preparatory to jihad with the aim of securing victory for Islam in another country and generally spread Islam.[44]

There are numerous Quranic directives, hadiths, and fatwas charging Muslims to immigrate, including:

Sura 2:218 Verily, those who have believed, and those who have emigrated (for Allah’s Religion) and have striven hard in the Way of Allah, all these hope for Allah’s Mercy. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

Sura 9:20 Those who have believed and emigrated and strove hard and fought in in Allah’s cause with their wealth and their lives are far higher in degree with Allah. They are the successful.

The primary goal of the Hijra is the establishment of an Islamic state. This is through dawa. Dawa means “to call.” In Islamic terms it means a call to Islam. The dawa is to spread the message of Islam as a softening-up process in preparation for jihad. The Hijra is considered, by Islamic scholars and leaders, to be the vanguard, a prelude to jihad for the establishment of an Islamic state.

The Hijra is a slow, stealthy process, gradually accustoming the host society to Muslim ways and Muslim demands.

At the initial stage of the Hijra, Muslim immigrants must create the conditions and infrastructure necessary to support the physical presence of Islamic faith. Even the Quranic rules such as the prohibition against the friendship with infidels are suspended for the sake of the goal of future Islamization.

One of the first steps is the building of mosques. Mosques are mistakenly viewed by non-Muslims as no more than a place of religious observance, but its goal is establishing a purposeful non-integrated Muslim identity to advance the goal of Islamization. Once mosques are erected, dawa centers are set up to spread the word of Islam. As Turkish Prime Minister Recept Erdogan has said:

The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers.[45]

Muslims immigrants form segregated communities, trading on the West’s politically correct doctrine of celebrating diversity.

Once the host society accepts the reality of the segregated Muslim communities, demands are made for separate swimming pools, halal food to be served in hospitals, prisons and schools, and prayer rooms to be set up in airports, sports stadiums, and public buildings. Next follow Islamic schools, usually subsidized by the host society’s taxpayers. Sharia law has gradually been implemented under the noses of the host countries’ authorities.

Muslims are encouraged to infiltrate the social, political, legal and academic institutes of their host countries. More and more Muslims are being elected to parliaments in the West. Unthinkable just a generation ago, London now has a Muslim Lord Mayor, Sadiq Khan. Mr. Khan has an interesting take on Islamic terrorism. Visiting New York shortly after a home-made bomb blasted New York’s Chelsea area on September 17, 2016, injuring 29 people, Mr. Khan declared that such attacks were “part and parcel” of life in a big city. “It is a reality I’m afraid that London, New York, other major cities around the world have got to be prepared for these sorts of things,” he said.[46]

In other words: Islamic terrorism is here to stay; get used to it.

Once the Muslim community reaches a certain size, visible changes in this country become apparent. Entire areas in Western cities become places where a woman dressed out of the norms of the Muslim dress code can be attacked, insulted and raped.

Gradually, fire services, ambulances, and other authorities avoid such areas. Even the police are reluctant to enter these areas because any entrance of the police to make an arrest of a Muslim criminal meets with fierce resistance and riots.

Another part of the Hijra infrastructure is the creation of multitudinous “charities.” These are generally tax-exempt entities used to raise funds (including taxpayer funds) to finance the building of mosques, Islamic schools and, in some cases, the support of terrorist organizations. For example, in November 2015, the British-based Islamic Relief Worldwide, the largest Islamic charity in the world with a $250 million operating budget, was designated a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates.

Other charities designated as terrorist organizations at the same time include the Muslim Association of Sweden, the Association of Italian Muslims, the Corboda Foundation in Britain and the Muslim America Society.[47]

Modern Islamic intellectuals and leaders have been actively working on applying the Doctrine of Immigration to the Muslim societies in Europe, Latin America, and the English-speaking countries.

Hence, in recent years, we have seen millions of Muslim “refugees” flooding into Europe, America, and the other English-speaking countries.

The jihad process is a two-pronged attack on Western countries and Western civilization. On the one hand, Western governments have become distracted in fighting a clearly-identified military jihadist enemy in Afghanistan and the Middle East.

Far less recognizable, however, is the menace posed by jihadist enemies who operate by deceit and stealth from inside the gates, utilizing al-Hijra. The latter threat is, arguably, a far more serious one to open, tolerant Western societies.

The local insurgents have become highly skilled at exploiting our tolerance, civil liberties, multiculturalism and racial vilification laws.

The six categories of Muslims

Whenever Islamic terrorism strikes somewhere in the West, media commentators and politicians always love to talk about the “moderate Muslims” living among us. We are endlessly reminded of the “voices” of moderation, reason, and peace within Islam.

To really understand the progress being made in the Islamic jihad against the West, we must first understand the six main categories of Muslims living in Western countries.

1) Assimilated Muslims

These are Muslim families living in much the same style as their hosts. They are fully or largely assimilated, live peaceful lives, hold down jobs, have minimal reliance on welfare and enjoy the benefits of living in a free society. They are probably just nominal Muslims.

2) Moderate Muslims

There is a minor part of Islam that is indeed religion, which consists of what a Muslim must do to avoid hell and go to Paradise, described as Islam’s five pillars.

The five pillars are prayer, charity to Muslims (Zakat), pilgrimage to Mecca at least once in their lifetime, fasting during Ramadan and declaring Mohammed to be the final prophet.

Moderate Muslims may follow the five pillars, but would rarely attend a mosque and otherwise live much as assimilated Muslims, enjoying living in a free society.

3) Fifth columnists (passive terrorists)

These are Muslims living within a country, ostensibly living “normal” lives while overtly or covertly supporting the imposition of sharia law via the al-Hijra concept.

They are basically a fifth column, a term used to describe a group of people living within a community acting on behalf of an external enemy to undermine the defenses of their host country. Clandestine fifth-column activities can involve acts of sabotage, disinformation or public relations activities to promote the “virtues” of the enemy while demeaning the culture of the local hosts.

Passive terrorists would rarely engage in terrorist attacks or even violence, but are secretly proud that the jihadists are “carrying out Allah’s work.” They don’t feel part of their host country and do not subscribe to the customs and laws of the country. They quietly lend support to terrorists by failing to denounce them.

To devout Muslims, sharia is the infallible word of God and must take precedence over “man-made” laws. It is not compatible with secular forms of government, human rights, freedom of thought and women’s rights. In some Muslim countries, notably Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Brunei, United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Yemen, sharia punishments, which include beheading, flogging, and stoning, continue to be practiced.

Passive terrorists’ goals are in alignment with those of the jihadists, which are to assist with the imposition of sharia law in their host country.

According to the Pew Forum, the total number Muslims in Europe in 2010 was about 44 million, excluding Turkey, with the number of Muslims living in the European Union about 19 million. With the recent mass migrations, and adding another 3 million living in the United States, we come to an estimated 25 million.

There is a dearth of statistics relating to the loyalties of Muslims living in Western countries, but some estimates can be gleaned from two studies in Britain and the United States.[48]

The British survey revealed that 23 percent of British Muslims wanted to live under sharia law, while the figure for the U.S. was 51 percent, with 19 percent approving of violence to establish sharia. Let’s be generous and take the British figure of 23 percent wanting sharia law and assume the same percentage applied across Europe.

That comes to a massive (and scary) figure of around six million fifth columnists living among us.

And to add insult to injury, a large percentage of passive terrorists rely upon generous welfare benefits paid by their host countries to support their lifestyle.

4) Criminal Muslims

Iranian sociologist Farhad Khosrokhavar reported in April 2015 that, of France’s 64,000 prisoners, 60 percent are Muslim, yet Muslims make up less than 8 percent of the population, nearly eight times over-represented.[49]

Based on data from 2011, Pew Research Center estimated that Muslims made up nine percent of the 1,598,780 state and federal prisoners in the United States, yet represent just 0.8 percent of the population. Muslims in the United States are over-represented in the prison population by 11.25 times their percentage of the population.

Previous chapters cite numerous examples of “no-go” areas in major European cities controlled by criminal gangs of Muslims where lawlessness, drug-trafficking, aggression and anti-social behavior are forcing out non-Muslims, and where police and authorities fear to enter.

5) Jihadists, fundamentalists, zealots and extremists

Jihadists attacks can range from brutal murders perpetrated by a single jihadist (euphemistically referred to by authorities as “lone wolf” attacks) to the large-scale slaughter of innocent civilians. Often the perpetrators are prepared to die in a hails of bullets or by blowing themselves up. The readiness to die is due to the Islamic propaganda that to die as a “martyr” will provide the martyr to the immediate entrance to paradise, where he will be greeted by a band of dark-eyed houris, eager for sex.

The martyr’s family experience a mixture of sadness and joy – sadness at losing their son (or daughter), but joy at knowing that they too have received a free pass to Paradise.

6) Reformist Muslims

There is a very small, but growing, number of Muslims and former Muslims, working to reform Islam. Appendix 6 provides details of the Muslim Reform Movement.

It is simply not acceptable that a large body of people are spiritually guided by a scripture which preaches intolerance, violence and supremacism. Muslims need to escape from its clutches, not least to protect their children from its corrupting influence.

Similarities between Soviet subversion and Islamic subversion

The Soviets used the term “active measures” to describe their covert and deceptive activities carried out in support of their foreign policy objectives.

The goal of active measures is to influence the opinions and actions of persons, institutions, governments and the public at large. They are activities distinct from intelligence and diplomatic operations. The essence of active measures is deception.

In applying Soviet-era terminology to Islamists, a parallel can be drawn between the Communist International (Comintern), on the one hand, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), on the other.

It is important to note that the OIC and MB are ideological and political organizations.

The OIC is a 57-nation organization representing the Muslim world, and an international organization second only in size to the United Nations.

The MB was founded in Egypt in 1928 and acts as a transnational Islamic organization. Its motto is:

“Allah is our objective; the Quran is our law, the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and dying in the way of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.”

The English-language website of the MB states that the organization is “an Egypt-born Islamist organization founded for launching Jihad against the infidels in general and Christian West, in particular, has been an ideological protectorate of Saudi Arabia for over half a century.”

According to an American conservative foundation, JudicialWatch.org, the Islamists’ active measures techniques include:

• Disinformation – a deliberate effort to deceive public and government opinion through written material or oral representations.
• Front groups – normally presented as non-governmental, non-political organizations engaged in promoting desirable goals such as world peace, civil rights, tolerance, understanding, ecumenism, and education.
• Political influence operations – Islamist operatives take an active role in political, governmental, media, business, labor or academic forums. Their goal is to leverage their participation and influence into real policy gains for Islam. Dramatic proof of the effectiveness of this policy was demonstrated on February 8, 2012, when the then FBI Director Robert S. Mueller told Islamic groups at a meeting that more than 700 pages of materials from FBI handbooks had been removed as they were deemed to be “offensive” to Muslims.[50]

Using the term “Islamophobia” as a propaganda weapon

“Islamophobia” is a term favored by the OIC, MB and other Islamist activists, as well as their left-wing friends. It is used as an offensive weapon to accuse non-Muslims of bigotry, and as a defensive weapon to invoke victim status for the accuser.

Contemporary coinage of “Islamophobia” is attributed to the Runnymede Trust, a leftist think tank in London. Its 1997 paper, Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All, defined Islamophobia as “an outlook or world-view involving an unfounded dread and dislike of Muslims, which results in practices of exclusion and discrimination.”[51]

In the context of influence operations, the word is a potent weapon that is often used to terminate rational discussion.[52] For that reason, in December 2012, the Associated Press decided to drop the term from its reporting AP stylebook.[53]

Multiculturalism, political correctness, misguided notions of tolerance and sheer willful blindness have combined to create an atmosphere of confusion and denial about the current threat facing Western civilization. The subversion campaign, known as a “civilization jihad” is taking place under the noses of government authorities.

Details of this stealth jihad came to light in a document entered into evidence in the 2008 United States v. Holy Land Foundation terrorism finance trial.

The document, titled An Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in America, was written in 1991 by Mohamed Akram (also known as Mohamed Adlouni), a senior Hamas leader in the U.S. and a member of the Board of Directors of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America (MB, also known as the Ikhwan).

Read the document at Appendix 2 to understand what the jihadists have in store for the West.[54]

The document makes it clear that the Islamic Movement is an MB effort, led by the Ikhwan in America. The Explanatory Memorandum goes on to explain that the “Movement” is a “settlement process”(Hijra) to establish itself inside the United States and, once established, to undertake a “grand Jihad,” characterized as a “civilization jihadist” mission.

Jihad and hijra are complementary. Each one depends upon the other.

Their aims are exposed in these revealing words:

The process of settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist process” with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions – An Explanatory Memorandum.[55]

Yusuf al-Qaradawi Spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood “We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through the sword, but through dawa (stealth)”

Although referring to the U.S., the document uses the phrase, “eliminating and destroying Western civilization.” The Muslim Brotherhood operates in most Western countries through its multitude of front groups and affiliates. Nearly every organization operating within Western countries with the word “Islam” or “Muslim” in the title is set up to promote the civilization jihad through dawa (Islamization through stealth and deceit).

They are actively infiltrating academia and student groups, as well as legal, media, finance, political and judicial groups.

Multiculturalism has opened the floodgates to Muslim immigration to Western counties. There are now more than six million Muslims in France. France has 751 no-go areas for police where Muslims rule.

Guy Millière, a professor of cultural history and legal philosophy at the Sorbonne, predicted that Muslims, who now make up about 12 percent of France’s population, would in the years ahead account for more than 20 percent. In 20 years, he believed, Muslims would become a majority. He had these chilling words about the future of France:

France will become a Muslim country. French leaders know it. They will never take a decision that could make young radical Muslims angry. French leaders have no choice except to be leaders of the Arab-Muslim world.

France is the main enemy of Western civilization. The most dangerous enemy is always the enemy within, and France is the enemy within.[56]

The jihadists cannot believe their good luck at the stupidity of Western nations opening the floodgates to Muslim migration while stifling dissent with racial vilification laws – and aided and abetted, of course, by a left-wing media ready to shriek “racist” or “bigot” at anyone foolish enough to question the Muslim immigration and infiltration.

The French education system does not teach young people to love France and the West. It teaches them instead that colonialism plundered many poor countries, that colonized people had to fight to free themselves, and that the fight is not over.

It teaches them to hate France.[57] But it erroneously describes Islam as a religion that brought “justice, dignity and tolerance” wherever it reigned.

Seventh-grade students spend the first month of the school year learning what Islamic civilization brought to the world in science, architecture, philosophy and wealth. A few weeks later, they have to memorize texts explaining that the Church committed countless atrocious crimes.

Economics textbooks are steeped in Marxism and explain that capitalism exploits human beings and ravages nature. The Holocaust is still in the curriculum, but is taught less and less; teachers who dare to speak of it face aggressive remarks from Muslim students. A 2002 book, The Lost Territories of the Republic [Les Territoires perdus de la République], exposed the problem.[58] Since then, the situation has worsened considerably.[59]

Prime Minister Manuel Valls said in an interview with the French weekly newspaper, Le Journal du Dimanche, on July 31, 2016, that France would become an example – a “center of excellence” in the “teaching of Islamic theology.”[60]

Manuel Valls was criticized when he argued that the French should learn to live with terrorism. Critics of that view now are rarer. The French sense that Islam in France is here to stay. They see that the risks of riots in lawless zones are huge and that all those in positions of responsibility think and act as if it were too late to reverse the course. Fear fills the air.

Most of the French seem helpless.

The wish to welcome Muslims to France, but to leave completely aside that the assassins of Father Jacques Hamel acted in the name of Islam and jihad, seems like a signs of willful blindness, severely pathological denial, and a resigned, suicidal acceptance of what is coming.

So declares the graffiti around Brussels, Belgium’s largest city. Already one quarter of its population is Muslim, and they are expected to be in the majority within 20 years.

In a revealing (and scary) video, Abu Imran, leader of Shariah4Belgium, openly declares that sharia law will be implemented when Brussels become majority Muslim.

Islam is all about submission (Islam means submission). The dawa infiltration within our society is aimed at our submission. Every time a kindergarten bans Christmas carols or a Nativity play for fear of offending Muslims, or a recreational center allows special clothing or closed classes for female Muslims, or the government sets up a Muslim advisory group containing jihadists, or a police officer backs away from an aggressive, burqa-clad woman screaming “racist,” we have to that extent submitted to Islam.

Many British Muslims do not share the values of their non-Muslim compatriots, and say they want to lead separate lives under Islamic sharia law, according to the findings of a survey conducted by ICM Research[61] for a Channel 4 documentary, “What British Muslims Really Think,” which aired on April 13, 2016.

The poll – which showed that a significant part of the British Muslim community is becoming a separate “nation within a nation” – reignited the long-running debate about the failure of 30 years of British multiculturalism and the need for stronger measures to promote Muslim integration.

The 615-page survey found that more than 100,000 British Muslims sympathize with suicide-bombers and people who commit other terrorist acts. Moreover, only one in three British Muslims (34 percent) would contact the police if they believed that somebody close to them had become involved with jihadists.

In addition, 23 percent of British Muslims said Islamic sharia law should replace British law in areas with large Muslim populations.

At the same time, almost a third (31 percent) of British Muslims think polygamy should be legalized. Among 18-to-24-year-olds, 35 percent think it is acceptable to have more than one wife.

In an essay for the Sunday Times, Trevor Phillips, the host of the documentary and a former head of Britain’s Equality and Human Rights Commission, warned of a growing “chasm” between Muslims and non-Muslims in Britain that “isn’t going to disappear any time soon.”

Phillips wrote that the poll reveals “the unacknowledged creation of a nation within the nation, with its own geography, its own values, and its own very separate future.” He added: “I thought Europe’s Muslims would gradually blend into the landscape. I should have known better.”

Phillips was referring to his role in commissioning the 1997 report, Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All. Also known as the Runnymede Report, the document popularized the term “Islamophobia” in Britain and had a singular role in silencing criticism of mass immigration from the Muslim world.[62] Twenty years later, Phillips now concedes that he has had a change of heart.

In an essay for the Daily Mail, on April 11, 2016, Phillips, wrote:

There is a life-and-death struggle for the soul of British Islam – and this is not a battle that the rest of us can afford to sit out. We need to take sides.

Four percent – the equivalent of more than 100,000 British Muslims – told the researchers that they had sympathy for people who take part in suicide bombing to fight injustice. Asked if they knew that someone was involved with supporting terrorism in Syria, just one in three would report it to the police.

There is one truly terrifying finding. Muslims who have separatist views about how they want to live in Britain are far more likely to support terrorism than those who do not. And there are far too many of the former for us to feel that we can gradually defeat the threat.

Liberal-minded Muslims have been saying for some time that our live-and-let-live attitudes have allowed a climate to grow in which extremist ideas have flourished within Britain’s Muslim communities. Our politicians have tried to reassure us that only a tiny minority hold dangerous views.

All the while, girls are shipped off to have their genitals mutilated, young women and men are being pressured into marriages they do not want, and teenagers are being seduced into donning suicide vests or becoming jihadi brides.

In my view, we have to adopt a far more muscular approach to integration than ever, replacing the failed policy of multiculturalism.”

It will mean political parties no longer turning a blind eye to appalling misdemeanors in return for votes from community leaders – so-called silence-for-votes deals which created havoc in Rotherham and Rochdale and contributed to the grooming scandals in those towns.

Muslims want to be part of Britain – but many do not accept the values and behaviors that make Britain what it is; they believe that Islam offers a better future. And a small number feel that these sincerely held beliefs justify attempts to destroy our democracy.[63]

The flood of refugees into Europe during 2015 has just exacerbated an already dangerous situation.

In an interview with ZDF television, Hans-Georg Maassen, on February 5, 2016, the head of Germany’s domestic intelligence agency (Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz, BfV), warned that the Islamic State was deliberately planting jihadists among the refugees flowing into Europe. “The terror risk is very high,” he said.

On the previous day, the Berliner Zeitung quoted Maassen as saying that the BfV had received more than 100 warnings that there were Islamic State fighters among the refugees currently living in Germany. Some of the jihadists were known to have entered Germany using fake or stolen passports.[64]

Maassen also revealed that the BfV knows of 230 attempts by Salafists to canvass German refugee shelters in search of new recruits. In a recent interview with the Berlin newspaper, Der Tagesspiegel, Maassen said that the number of Salafists in Germany has now risen to 7,900.[65]

Although Salafists make up only a small fraction of the estimated six million Muslims living in Germany today, intelligence officials warn that most of those attracted to Salafi ideology are impressionable young Muslims who, at a moment’s notice, are willing to carry out terrorist acts in the name of Islam.

In an annual report, the BfV described Salafism as the “most dynamic Islamist movement in Germany.” It added:

The absolutist nature of Salafism contradicts significant parts of the German constitutional order. Specifically, Salafism rejects the democratic principles of separation of state and religion, popular sovereignty, religious and sexual self-determination, gender equality and the fundamental right to physical integrity.

In an interview with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Maassen warned: “Salafists want to establish an Islamic state in Germany.”[66]

According to the German newspaper, Die Welt, the Turkish government has sent 970 clerics – most of whom do not speak German – to lead 900 mosques in Germany that are controlled by the Turkish-Islamic Union for Religious Affairs (DITIB), a branch of the Turkish government’s Directorate for Religious Affairs, known in Turkish as Diyanet.

According to Die Welt, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has increased the size, scope, and power of the Diyanet, which now has a budget of 6.4 billion Turkish lira ($2.3 billion), which is more than the budgets of 12 Turkish government ministries, including the interior ministry and the foreign ministry. The Diyanet now has 120,000 employees, up from 72,000 in 2004.[67]

The Turkish clerics in Germany are effectively Turkish civil servants who do the bidding of the Turkish government. Critics accuse Erdogan of using DITIB mosques to prevent Turkish migrants from integrating into German society.

German politician Cem Özdemir, co-chairman of the Green Party, said that the DITIB is “nothing more than an extended arm of the Turkish state.” He added: “Rather than being a legitimate religious organization, the Turkish government has turned the DITIB into a political front organization of Erdogan’s AKP party.

Erdogan has repeatedly warned Turkish immigrants not to assimilate into German society.

During a trip to Berlin in November 2011, Erdogan (then Turkish prime minister) declared, “Assimilation is a violation of human rights.” In February 2011, Erdogan told a crowd of more than 10,000 Turkish immigrants in Düsseldorf: “We are against assimilation. No one should be able to rip us away from our culture and civilization.” In February 2008, Erdogan told 16,000 Turkish immigrants in Cologne that “assimilation is a crime against humanity.”[68]

Not to be outdone, Saudi Arabia’s King Salman, in September 2015, announced a plan to finance the construction of 200 mosques in Germany to provide for the spiritual needs migrants and refugees who arrived there in 2015. The mosques would, presumably, adhere to Wahhabism, the official and dominant form of Sunni Islam in Saudi Arabia. Wahhabism is an austere form of Islam, known as Salafism, that insists on a literal interpretation of the Quran.[69]

Appeasement leads to submission to Islam

In their stealth program, the Islamists are constantly pushing Western authorities into submission. Submission is a prelude to Islamic subjugation, conquest, and domination.

The numerous terrorist attacks have created an element of fear in the minds of government leaders and authorities. This has colored their thinking in dealing with Muslim demands, and they have decided that appeasement is the easiest solution.

Hence, Western authorities have responded with the well-worn policy of appeasement, the same appeasement policy that democratic governments followed in responding to the rise of Hitler.

And that didn’t work out well.

Once Muslims have conquered a land, they invoke the fundamental principle that non-Muslims in the sharia-dominated country have three choices: convert to Islam, be killed or enslaved, or live as subservient and tax-paying dhimmis. The condition of living as a dhimmi is known as dhimmitude. The principle is rooted in the Quran and the earliest history of Islam. The tax payable by dhimmis is known as jizya.[70] Many Muslims living on welfare in Western countries regard their welfare payments as jizya.

The belligerent and intransigent self-assertion of Islam, both through terrorist attacks and pressure from within society by infiltration of key agencies, and by constantly pushing the boundaries, aided by a compliant media, has created a dhimmi attitude amongst politicians, community leaders, academics, Christian leaders, and even in some cases the military and law-enforcement agencies such as the FBI. The politicians, leaders, and agencies tasked with protecting their citizens from Muslim incursions and assaults have largely displayed cowardice, appeasement and servility in the face of Muslim belligerence.

Some examples illustrate how far dhimmitude has taken hold amongst Western leaders and agencies:

• In 2012 the FBI eliminated hundreds of pages of “anti-Islam” educational material from its own training programs and those of other law-enforcement agencies.
• On April 24, 2012, Joint Chiefs Chairman General Martin E. Dempsey ordered a similar purge, calling on the entire U.S. military to “review” its educational and training classes, files and rosters of instructors to ensure that no member of the armed services was studying material “disrespectful of the Islamic religion.”[71]
• In 2006, Ezra Levant was the only publisher in Canada to allow his readers to see the so-called “Mohammed cartoons.” As a result he was investigated by the provincial government of Alberta and subjected to three long years of judicial harassment.[72]
• In May 2016, British army officers visited and prayed at a fundamentalist mosque that has been linked to the 7/7, 9/11 and San Bernadino (December 2, 2015) terrorist attacks. The Zakaria mosque in Dewsbury, England, is run by a fundamentalist group, Tablighi Jamaat (often known as the “Army of Darkness”), which has called upon British Muslims to wage jihad against Western troops. The visit by the 4th Infantry Brigade, Catterick, North Yorkshire, was reported on its Facebook page. An army spokesman said the visit “was part of a wider strategy of demonstrating that service with the British Army is entirely consistent with Islam.”[73]
• The Swedish minister of integration, Jens Orback, said we must be nice to Muslims now so that when they are in the majority they’ll be nice to us.[74]

British army officers demonstrate submission to Islam Officers from 4^th Infantry Brigade in Yorkshire pray with Muslims at Zakaria mosque in Dewsbury, England

• Former French President Nicholas Sarkozy called Islam “one of the greatest and most beautiful civilizations the world has known,” at a speech in Riyadh in January 2008.[75]
• In 2008 the Australian government funded the establishment of the National Centre of Excellence for Islamic Studies (NCEIS), a three-university consortium comprising the University of Melbourne, Griffith University and the University of Western Sydney, to “promote understanding of Islam and Muslims.”
• In 2009 the NCEIS of the University of Melbourne launched, in conjunction with the Australian Curriculum Studies Association, Learning From One Another: Bringing Muslim Perspectives into Australian Schools, a 120-page Islamic indoctrination course aimed at Australian schoolchildren. The document contains gross distortions and falsehoods, presenting a positive, sugar-coated version of Islam. For example, while claiming to promote inclusiveness, the document which positively promotes Islam to our children, supports separate Muslim facilities, separate financial institutions, separate rules within the schools system and separate foods. The workbook has been widely distributed to teachers. The NCEIS runs workshops for teachers to carry the indoctrination back to the classrooms.
• A number of Muslim organizations run a Mafia-style protection racket in Western countries called halal certification – certifying the food is permissible under Islamic sharia law. Halal certification schemes are widely imposed on non-Muslims. Certification schemes began in the 1980s and are funded by consumers through a multi-level system of one-off and recurring fees, paid by suppliers to Islamic organizations. It is in effect a hidden Islamic tax on goods and services.

The contributors to these schemes include most major dairy companies, poultry suppliers, abattoirs and large multinationals like Simplot, Unilever, Nestlé, Cadbury, Kraft and many more. The International Market Bureau of Canada estimates the halal industry is worth over $560 billion each year. The Q Society of Australia says it is around $2.3 trillion, and expanding by 20 percent per year.

These schemes are not limited to food alone, with products and services ranging from halal-certified cosmetics to water, trucks, warehousing and sharia finance – there is no limit to their scope. Plans are in place to certify every step of the market from suppliers of animal feed, to food-processing and, eventually, the transport to your supermarket and shopping bag. Few products are labeled as certified halal. Most meat and dairy produce bought in supermarkets, or when eating out, are now halal-certified, but not labeled.

A U.S. report in May 2014 revealed that Cadbury was in real trouble with its export market. After having paid an Indonesian halal-certification group the correct protection money, the Malaysian Health Ministry found traces of pork DNA in its products. All hell broke loose. Cadbury agreed to recall all pork-”tainted” items from stores overseas, a massive undertaking amid cries of foul play. More than 20 Muslim groups called for a boycott on all Cadbury’s products, saying that a holy war needs to be waged against the confectionery giant for attempting to “weaken” Muslims. So lucrative is the scam that different certifier groups are vying with each to collect the protection money.

The massive taxes raised from Western consumers finance such Islamic activities as promotion of sharia law, the building and operation of madrassas and mosques, to operational costs of Islamic terror groups.

• On July 7, 2005, suicide bombs ripped through three London underground trains and a double-decker bus, killing 56 people. The British were stunned to learn that the bombers were Muslims, born and bred in Britain. When the BBC began referring to “terrorists” and “terrorism,” BBC news chief Helen Boaden soon put an end to this, ordering reporters to speak of “bombers” not “terrorists.” Even the BBC’s reportage, archived online, was retrospectively cleansed of the offensive words. And how did the authorities react to the terrorist act?

The chief constable in Nottinghamshire gave his 4,000 officers green ribbons to wear as a sign of solidarity with Muslims. In a craven act of submission, the Bedfordshire police put out orders that, when raiding Muslim homes, officers should remove their shoes, not disrupt prayer, look away from uncovered women, and not use dogs (who would “desecrate the premises”).

• In January 2008, the British government officially adopted new language for declarations about Islamic terrorism. Islamic terrorists were henceforth to be referred to as people pursuing “anti-Islamic activity,” because “linking terrorism to Islam is inflammatory, and risks alienating mainstream Muslim opinion.”[76]

• In what can only be described as a moment of bizarre stupidity, on September 9, 2016, one of the largest police forces in the UK announced that it would consider letting Muslim officers wear burkas in an attempt to boost diversity.

At a meeting, Chief Constable David Thompson said he would consider employing staff who wear a burka as he was seeking to increase black and minority ethnic (BME) officers in the region to 30 percent.[77]

West Midlands Police said it will discuss allowing the traditional Islamic dress – which covers the entirety of a woman’s face and body – to become part of Muslim female officers’ uniform.

• In 2015, Muslim jihadists murdered more people in France, than were killed by terrorism in the country during the entire 20th century.[78]

On January 7, of that year, Saïd and Chérif Kouachi stormed the Paris offices of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, massacring 12 and injuring 11 others.

In the days that followed, a comrade of the earlier jihadists committed a string of murders, which culminated in a siege at the kosher supermarket. Amedy Coulibaly killed five and injured 11 more.

The attacks in Paris on the night of Friday, November 13, by gunmen and suicide-bombers, hit a concert hall, a major stadium, restaurants and bars, almost simultaneously – and left 130 people dead and hundreds wounded. The attacks were described by President François Hollande as an “act of war” organized by the Islamic State (IS) militant group.

The Prime Minister of France, Manuel Valls, obviously had further thoughts about the President’s “act of war” statement, when in an interview with Libération on April 12, 2015, in a craven act of cowardice, he said: “I believe in my country, in its message and its universal values. I would like us to be capable of demonstrating that Islam, a great world religion and the second religion of France, is fundamentally compatible with the Republic, democracy, our values, and equality between men and women.”[79]

Manuel Valls was later forced to admit, in the interview, that this “compatibility” is something doubted by “a majority of our fellow citizens.”

• On June 4, 2009, President Obama prostrated himself before the Islamic world in his famous (or infamous) televised speech at al-Azhar University in Cairo. In Obama’s address to “Muslims around the world,” he announced “a partnership between America and Islam,” stating that “I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes about Islam.”

Born to a Muslim father, Barack Hussein Obama further proclaimed that “Islam is part of America” and we “overlap and share common principles.” The Islamic world interpreted Obama’s weasel words at Cairo’s al-Azhar University, the chief center of Sunni Islamic learning in the world, as declaring that henceforth America’s president would be subservient to Islam.

President Barack Hussein Obama bows in submission before King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia

As Mark Steyn wryly observed:

How quickly the supposed defenders of liberal, pluralist, Western values came to sound as if they were competing to be Islam’s lead prison bitch.[80]

 

Chapter 10: Understanding Islam

[1]       Munira Mirza, Abi Senthilkumaran and Zein Ja’far, Living Apart Together: British Muslims and the Paradox of Multiculturalism (Policy Exchange, London), a 101-page report, published on January 29, 2007.
URL: www.policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/living-apart-together-jan-07.pdf

[2]       Hadiths are collections of reports describing the words, actions and habits of Muhammad.

[3]       Pavan Amara, “Islington girls forced into marriage at the age of nine”, Islington Tribune (UK), January 27, 2012.
URL: http://archive.islingtontribune.com/news/2012/jan/islington-girls-forced-marriage-age-nine

[4]       Ibid.

[5]       Nonie Darwish, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law (Nashville, Tennessee: Thomas Nelson, 2008).

[6]       Ronald Segal, Islam’s Black Slaves: The Other Black Diaspora (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2001), pp. 206 & 222.

[7]       Ibn Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad, Alfred Guillaume trans. (Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 511.

[8]       The Koran, surah 33, verse 50.

[9]       The Koran, surah 24, verse 33.

[10]     United Nations, Ad Hoc Committee of Experts on Slavery – Draft Report (1951), p. 84.

[11]     Emmet Scott, Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy (Nashville, Tennessee: New English Review Press, 2012), p. 189.

[12]     Robert C. Davis, Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, Italy, 1500-1800 (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan, 2004), p. 23.

[13]     Ibid., p. 172.

[14]     Shaikh Salih al-Fawzan, “Affirmation of slavery” page 24 of Taming a Neo-Qutubite Fanatic: A Dialogue with Idris Palmer, Part 1 (2007), p. 24.

[15]     “Mauritania”, The Global Slavery Index (Minderoo Foundation, Dalkeith, Western Australia).
URL: www.globalslaveryindex.org/country/mauritania/

[16]     Stephen Brown, “Slavery convictions in Mauritania: real reform or deliberate deception?”, FrontPage Magazine, June 10, 2016.
URL: www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/263142/slavery-convictions-mauritania-real-reform-or-stephen-brown

[17]     David Blair, “Nigeria’s Boko Haram isn’t just kidnapping girls: it’s enslaving them”, The Telegraph (UK), January 13, 2015.
URL: www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11342879/Nigerias-Boko-Haram-isnt-just-kidnapping-girls-its-enslaving-them.html

[18]     “Hundreds freed from Boko Haram require medical care, counselling”, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) News, May 6, 2015.
URL: www.unfpa.org/news/hundreds-freed-boko-haram-require-medical-care-counselling

[19]     Michael F. Haverluck, “214 of 234 freed Boko Haram captives pregnant, used as sex slaves”, One News Now (American Family Association), May 10, 2015.
URL: www.onenewsnow.com/persecution/2015/05/10/214-of-234-freed-boko-haram-captives-pregnant-used-as-sex-slaves

[20]     Escape from Hell: Torture and Sexual Slavery in Islamic State Captivity in Iraq (London: Amnesty International, 2014).
URL: www.amnesty.org.uk/files/escape_from_hell_-_torture_and_sexual_slavery_in_islamic_state_captivity_in_iraq_-_english_2.pdf

[21]     Paul Wood, “Islamic State: Yazidi women tell of sex-slavery trauma”, BBC News, December 22, 2014.
URL: www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-30573385

[22]     Ibid.

[23]     Nick Craven and Rizwan Syed, “Yes, boys, you can have sex slaves”, Daily Mail (UK), July 13, 2016.
URL: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3716280/Yes-boys-sex-slaves-Outrage-British-Muslim-cleric-mosque-Cardiff-jihadis-radicalised-tells-teenagers-captives-permissible-Islam.html

[24]     Andrew Campbell, “‘Taqiyya’: how Islamic extremists deceive the West”, National Observer: Australia and World Affairs, No. 65, June-August 2005, pp. 11-23.
URL: www.nationalobserver.net/2005_winter_ed3.htm

Andrew Campbell, “‘Taqiyya’ and the global war against terrorism”, National Observer: Australia and World Affairs, No. 66, September-November 2005, pp. 26-36.
URL: www.nationalobserver.net/campb_spring_2005.htm

[25]     Darwish, Cruel and Usual Punishment, op. cit., p. 198.

[26]     Ali Dashti, Twenty-Three Years: A Study of the Prophetic Career of Mohammad [1974], F.R.C. Bagley translation (Oxford: Routledge, 2008).

[27]     Nonie Darwish, in The Devil We Don’t Know: The Dark Side of Revolutions in the Middle East (Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2012).

[28]     Howard Kainz, “Islam and the Decalogue”, The Catholic Thing (USA), July 23, 2016.
URL: www.thecatholicthing.org/2016/07/23/islam-and-the-decalogue/

[29]     Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad, op. cit., p. 219.

[30]     “The Quran’s verses of violence”, TheReligionOfPeace.com (USA), undated.
URL: www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx

[31]     Global Terrorism Index 2015 (Sydney: Institute for Economics and Peace), November 2015, p. 41.
URL: http://economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Global-Terrorism-Index-2015.pdf

[32]     Carey Lodge, “Nigeria: at least 5,000 Catholics killed by Boko Haram”, Christian Today (London), May 13, 2015.
URL: www.christiantoday.com/article/nigeria.at.least.5000.catholics.killed.by.boko.haram/53864.htm

[33]     Darwish, Cruel and Usual Punishment, op. cit., p. xix.

[34]     Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi, Jihad in Islam [1939] (Beirut: Holy Quran Publishing House, 1980), p. 9.

[35]     Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri, Umdat al Salik [Reliance of the Traveller] [14th century]: Book H: Zakat [alms-giving], H8.17.

[36]     Salih al-Fawzan, A Summary of Islamic Jurisprudence, English trans., 2 vols (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Al-Maiman Publishing House, 2nd edition, 2009), Vol. 1, pages 364-365

[37]     “Holy Land Foundation and leaders convicted on providing material support to Hamas terrorist organization”, U.S. Attorney’s Office, May 27, 2009.
URL: https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/dallas/press-releases/2009/dl052709.htm

[38]     “List of charities accused of ties to terrorism”, Wikipedia.
URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_charities_accused_of_ties_to_terrorism

[39]     “List of groups designated terrorist organisations by the UAE [United Arab Emirates]”, The National (Abu Dhabi), November 16, 2014.
URL: www.thenational.ae/uae/government/list-of-groups-designated-terrorist-organisations-by-the-uae

Chapter 11: The Muslim Invasion of the West

[40]       Geert Wilders, Marked for Death: Islam’s War Against the West and Me (Washington, DC: Regnery, 2012), p. 6.

[41]       Viscount James Bryce and Arnold J. Toynbee, The Treatment of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, 1915–1916 [commissioned by the British government, 1916], Ara Sarafian ed. (Princeton, New Jersey: Gomidas Institute, uncensored edition, 2000).

[42]       Christopher J. Walker, Armenia: The Survival of a Nation (London: Croom Helm, 1980), pp. 200-203.

[43]       Hadith no. 2863 Kitab al Amthael, reported by Tirmizi.

[44]       Sam Solomon and Elias Al Maqdasi, Modern Day Trojan Horse: Al-Hijra, the Islamic Doctrine of Immigration: Accepting Freedom or Imposing Islam? (Charlottesville, Virginia: ANM Books, 2009).

[45]       “Turkey’s charismatic pro-Islamic leader”, BBC News, November 4, 2002.
URL: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2270642.stm

[46]       Pippa Crerar, “New York explosion: Sadiq Khan says terror attacks are ‘part and parcel of life in a big city’”, Evening Standard (UK), September 18, 2016.
URL: www.standard.co.uk/news/world/new-york-explosion-sadiq-khan-says-terror-attacks-are-part-and-parcel-of-life-in-a-big-city-a3347891.html

[47]       “UAE Cabinet approves list of designated terrorist organisations, groups”, Emirates News Agency (Abu Dhabi), November 16, 2014.
URL: http://wam.ae/en/details/1395272478814

[48]       “ICM Muslims survey for Channel 4”, ICM Unlimited (London), April 11, 2016.
URL: www.icmunlimited.com/polls/icm-muslims-survey-for-channel-4/

[49]     Johanna Markind, “Why are so many Muslims in prison?”, Middle East Forum (Philadelphia), August 30, 2015.
URL: www.meforum.org/blog/2015/08/islam-prison

[50]     “U.S. Government purges of law enforcement training material deemed ‘offensive’ to Muslims: Documentation and analysis of Islamist active measures and influence operations targeting anti-terrorism training”, Judicial Watch: Special Report (Judicial Watch, Inc., Washington, DC), December 5, 2013.
URL: www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/JWSRGovtPurgeAndActiveMeasures5Dec2013.pdf

[51]     Gordon Conway, Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All (London: Runnymede Trust, 1997).

[52]     Hal G.P. Colebatch, “Islamophobia is dangerous humbug”, The Spectator (UK), March 11, 2017.
URL: www.spectator.co.uk/2017/03/islamophobia-dangerous-humbug/

[53]     Les Fabian Brathwaite, “AP drops ‘homophobia’, ‘Islamophobia’ from style book”, Queerty (USA), November 27, 2012.
URL: www.queerty.com/ap-drops-homophobia-islamaphobia-from-style-book-20121127

[54]     Ken Schultz, “Western nations under threat from stealth jihad”, Global Comment (Australia), April 3, 2013.
URL: http://globalcomment.net/article/western-nations-under-threat-from-stealth-jihad

[55]     Mohamed Akram [aka Mohamed Adlouni], An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in America, May 22, 1991, p. 21, accessible from the Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT), Washington, DC, at:
URL: www.investigativeproject.org/documents/20-an-explanatory-memorandum-on-the-general.pdf

[56]     Guy Millière, “A new Muslim country”, FrontPage Magazine, May 12, 2003.
URL: http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=18272

[57]     François Desouche, “L’idéologie tiers-mondiste dans les manuels scolaires”, Fdesouche.com (Paris), November 11, 2010.
URL: www.fdesouche.com/154143-veronique-bouzou-sur-lideologie-tiers-mondiste-dans-les-manuels-scolaires

[58]     Emmanuel Brenner (pen-name of Georges Bensoussan), Les Territoires perdus de la République: antisémitisme, racisme et sexisme en milieu scolaire [The Lost Territories of the Republic: Antisemitism, Racism and Sexism in (French) Schools] (Paris: Mille et Une Nuits, 2002).

[59]     Guy Millière, “France’s death spiral”, Gatestone Insitute (New York), March 5, 2017.
URL: www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10007/france-death-spiral

[60]     Manuel Valls, “Reconstruire l’islam de France”, Le Journal du Dimanche (Paris), July 31, 2016.
URL: www.lejdd.fr/Politique/Manuel-Valls-Reconstruire-l-islam-de-France-800035

[61]     “ICM Muslims survey for Channel 4”, ICM Unlimited (London), April 11, 2016.
URL: www.icmunlimited.com/polls/icm-muslims-survey-for-channel-4/

[62]     Conway, Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All, op. cit.

[63]     Trevor Phillips, “Ex-equalities chief reveals how extremist ideas have been allowed to flourish”, Daily Mail (UK), April 11, 2016.
URL: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3533161/This-life-death-struggle-stark-analysis-former-equalities-chief-reveals-extremist-ideas-allowed-flourish.html

[64]     Markus Decker, “Razzien in Attendorn, Hannover und Berlin Mutmaßliche Terrorzelle zerschlagen – Hinweise auf Ziel in Berlin”, Berliner Zeitung (Berlin), February 4, 2016.
URL: www.berliner-zeitung.de/politik/razzia-fluechtlngsheim-attendorn-sote-23558956

[65]     Ibid.

[66]     Eckart Lohse, “Salafisten wollen islamischen Staat in Deutschland errichten”, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (Frankfurt), April 22, 2015.
URL: www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/salafisten-wollen-staat-in-deutschland-errichten-13552496.html

[67]     Wolfgang Büscher, Claus Christian Malzahn, Freia Peters and Deniz Yücel, “Kritik an Erdogans türkischen Predigern in Deutschland”, Die Welt (Berlin), April 24, 2016.
URL: www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article154680761/Kritik-an-Erdogans-tuerkischen-Predigern-in-Deutschland.html

[68]     Soeren Kern, “Proposal seeks to ban foreign funding of mosques in Germany”, Gatestone Institute (New York), April 28, 2016.
URL: www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7931/germany-islam-law

[69]     Ibid.

[70]     Mark Durie, The Third Choice: Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom (Melbourne: Deror Books, 2010).

[71]     West, American Betrayal, op. cit., p. 9.

[72]     Mark Steyn, After America: Get Ready for Armageddon (Washington, DC: Regnery, 2011), p. 295.

[73]     Liam Deacon and Raheem Kassam, “UK armed forces ‘pray’ at terror-linked ‘army of darkness’ mosque”, Breitbart (London edition), May 17, 2016.
URL: www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/17/british-army-pray-army-darkness-tablighi-jamaat-radical-mosque/

[74]     Steyn, After America, op. cit., p. 297.

[75]     “Nicolas Sarkozy”, Wikipedia.
URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolas_Sarkozy

[76]     Quoted in Wilders, Marked for Death, op. cit., p. 11.

[77]     Abe Hawken, “West Midland police planning to let officers wear full burkas”, Daily Mail (UK), September 9, 2016.
URL: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3781350/Police-force-planning-let-Muslim-officers-wear-burkas-attract-ethnic-female-minority-officers-boost-diversity.html

[78]     George Igler, “The French appetite for appeasement”, Gatestone Institute (New York), June 4, 2016.
URL: www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8172/france-appeasement

[79]     Laurent Joffrin, Grégoire Biseau, Lilian Alemagna and Laure Bretton, “Manuel Valls: ‘Depuis plus de trente ans, on me demande si je suis de gauche’”, Libération (Paris), April 12, 2016.
URL: www.liberation.fr/france/2016/04/12/manuel-valls-depuis-plus-de-trente-ans-on-me-demande-si-je-suis-de-gauche_1445774

[80]     Steyn, After America, op. cit., p. 297.