Chapter 9: The Dangers of Multiculturalism

The great majority of Western populations have been allowed remarkably little input into multiculturalism policies, policies that will affect their lives and their futures. Nothing has contributed more to the breakdown of social cohesion in Western societies than multiculturalism. Yet anyone with the courage to challenge the appropriateness of this misbegotten social engineering experiment has been condemned, censured and sneered at.

British Labour government deliberately flooded Britain with millions of immigrants

In the ultimate indictment of the supreme arrogance of the British ruling class, The Telegraph sensationally reported in 2009 that the ruling Labour Party had purposefully flooded Britain with several million immigrants, without consulting its citizens, in order to socially engineer a “truly multicultural” country.[i]

The huge increases in migrants over the previous decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt to radically change the country and to “rub the Right’s nose in diversity,” according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Prime Minister Tony Blair. He said mass immigration was the result of a deliberate plan, but ministers were reluctant to discuss this for fear that it would alienate the party’s “core working-class vote.”[ii]

Lord Maurice Glasman – a personal friend of the Labour Party leader – stated in 2011, “Labour lied to people about the extent of immigration… and there’s been a massive rupture of trust.” He admitted that the Labour Party had sometimes been actively hostile to the white natives. In particular, they tended to view white working-class voters as “an obstacle to progress.”

Although most of the blame for the massive, and largely uncontrolled immigration was sheeted home to Tony Blair, it was his Minister for Asylum and Immigration during Blair’s first term, Barbara Roche, who engineered the transformation of immigration policies. While the Prime Minister was concentrating on other matters, Roche changed every aspect of the British government’s immigration policies.

Under Roche, all people claiming to be asylum-seekers would be allowed to stay in Britain – whether they were genuine or not. Roche thought that restraints on immigration were “racist.” Whenever there was any criticism of her policy, Roche dismissed it as racist.

Over her period in office, she repeatedly stated her ambition to transform Britain. What she and a few others around her sought was a wholesale change of British society. The activities of Roche and a few other support the claim that theirs was a deliberate policy of societal transformation: a culture war waged against the British people using immigrants and the much-feared word “racist” as battering rams.[1]

Based on investigative reporter’s Tom Bower’s recent book, Broken Vows: Tony Blair – The Tragedy of Power, Britain’s Daily Mail characterized the episode as a “cynical conspiracy to deceive the British people and let in 2 million migrants against the rules.”[2]

Multiculturalism was introduced into most Western countries with little or no consultation with the citizens and has now become firmly entrenched.

The Ford Foundation funded and promoted the establishment of multiculturalism in the United States[3]

The multicultural idea first entered American politics through the universities, when a succession of Ford Foundation grants in the late 1960s and 1970s helped establish the politicized fields of Black Studies and Women’s Studies, with others to follow. These pseudo-disciplines celebrated ethnic, racial and gender separatism, fostering group identities over a core American identity. Their common theme was the race-gender-class oppression of designated groups by American capitalism.

The very first Black Studies program, created in 1967 at San Francisco State College as a concession to a student strike organized by radicals that shut down the school, set the pattern for other multicultural curricula that followed. The program dispensed with traditional academic subjects like science and math in favor of so-called “black science” and “black math” that emphasized racial consciousness and racial agendas. A second Black Studies program was created at Cornell University in 1969 when the school bowed to shotgun-wielding black student radicals who occupied the administration building and demanded the formation of a black studies department and the right to appoint their own professors. The demands were mostly granted. See Chapter 3 for more information.

Following this template, women’s studies programs were created following the principle that gender differences were not biologically based but “socially constructed” as part of a system of race, gender and class hierarchies designed to oppress racial minorities, women and transgender individuals, and low-to-moderate-income workers. At their core, each division of this new multicultural curriculum constituted an assault on the idea of a common national identity, and of America as a society based on the principles of equality and individual rights.

Franklin Thomas, who served as president of the Ford Foundation from 1979 to 1996, was instrumental in promoting multiculturalist agendas through strategic grant-making. In a September 12, 1990 media release, Thomas explained the Foundation’s intention to “broaden cultural and intellectual diversity in American higher education.”

Thomas added: “Most of us have little understanding of the diverse culture, attitudes, and experiences that make up our own societies. Unfortunately, this ignorance about other cultures breeds insensitivity and intolerance in young and old alike.” He sealed his theory with a strong bottom line: “To reach the roots of intolerance and improve campus life, we must make the teaching of non-Western cultures a basic element of undergraduate education.”[4]

Toward that end, the Ford Foundation in 1990 “invited” 200 colleges to compete for grants of $100,000. There was a major stipulation, however. Any group or institution that received any money from the Foundation would be obliged to adhere to its affirmative action guidelines. To comply with those guidelines, Ford required every grant application to include a “diversity table” detailing the number of non-whites and women who were employed or served by the organization or school seeking assistance. Notably, the Foundation did not consider Asian Americans to be a minority group eligible for hiring preferences.

It had occurred to the Left that well-endowed foundations, with their enormous financial clout and appearance of being above politics, were the institutions best positioned to change the campus climate. Stripped of all the elegant rationales and academic persiflage, it was essentially a matter of using lucrative grants to bribe administrators into making the desired changes.

Mafia involvement in the introduction of multiculturalism into Australia

Before the 1970s, Australia had a very successful immigration policy based on assimilation and integration. Migrants were generally welcomed and accepted by the populace. All three levels of government (federal, state and local) provided a variety of migrant services to help the “New Australians,” as they were called, to feel welcome and to settle in.

In the late 1960s, a group of social activists, embracing the ideology of multiculturalism, began a concerted campaign to introduce multiculturalism into Australia. Members of the group inveigled their way on to advisory groups reporting to government where they were able to influence government policy. With intense lobbying, their ideas were gradually accepted as government policy.

This major shift in immigration policy, which was ultimately to have a major impact on Australian culture, came in through the back door with minimal public consultation and minimal media scrutiny.

Immigration Minister, Al Grassby On the Mafia payroll when he was instrumental in introducing multiculturalism into Australia

When the Whitlam Labor government swept into power in the 1972 federal election, the newly appointed Minister for Immigration, Albert “Al” Jaime Grassby, found he presided over this drastic change in immigration policy that he knew little about. However, Grassby soon embraced the policy and promoted it (along with promoting himself) and he came to be known in Australia as “the father of multiculturalism.”

But there was a dark side to Grassby. He was on the payroll of the Calabrian Mafia. With Mafia money, he won the “unwinnable” seat of Riverina, centered on the town of Griffith in central New South Wales.

A branch of the Italian Mafia, L’Onorata Società, or Honoured Society, had established itself in Griffith to organize the marijuana and heroin trade for which Griffith would later become notorious.

In 1977, Griffith furniture store-owner Donald Mackay, who had campaigned against the rampaging drug production and distribution in the area, was murdered on the orders of the Mafia. One senior member of the Society, Gianfranco Tizzoni, turned police informer and detailed to authorities Grassby’s involvement with the Mafia. In submissions to the authorities, he provided evidence of the favors Grassby performed for the Mafia in return for the money he had received.

Incredibly, Grassby never faced a jail sentence for his crimes. The only feasible explanation appeared in an article in the May 9, 2005 edition of Melbourne’s Herald Sun under the headline, “Grassby crimes cover-up: Outspoken MP hid 40-year links with Mafia syndicate bosses”:

The detective who arrested controversial Federal MP Al Grassby 18 years ago claims the National Crimes Authority bowed to political pressure not to fully investigate his mafia links.

Retired NCA senior investigator Bruce Provost said he had no doubt the Whitlam Labor minister was paid to commit crimes and do favors for the Calabrian mafia.

Speaking publicly for the first time about the NCA’s inquiry, Mr. Provost said Mr. Grassby was firmly in the Mafia’s pocket. He said there was more than enough intelligence on Mr. Grassby to warrant a full investigation, but he was held back by the NCA.[5]

Robert Trimbole One of the alleged ringleaders of the Calabrian Mafia that had Al Grassby in its pocket

In Australia, following the initial moves of the Whitlam Labor government in 1973, further official national multicultural policies were implemented by Malcolm Fraser’s conservative Liberal government in 1978. The Labor government of Bob Hawke continued with these policies during the 1980s and early 1990s, and the policies were further supported by Paul Keating up until his electoral defeat in 1996. Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) policies continue to be implemented at all levels of government and public service, such as medical support systems which cater specifically to non-English-speaking residents.

The meaning of multiculturalism has changed significantly since its formal introduction to Australia. Originally, the mainstream population understood it as a need for acceptance of the fact that many members of the Australian community originally came from different cultures and still had ties to these cultures. However, it has since come to mean the rights of migrants within mainstream Australia to express their cultural identity.

The concept of multiculturalism was bolstered by a multitude of grants from governments, with an eye to capturing the ethnic vote, to a whole range of bodies to promote their separate identities and to lobby for more grants and influence. Ethnic councils have become a taxpayer-funded industry.[6]

European leaders condemn multiculturalism for its “utter failure”

In February 2011, British Prime Minister David Cameron launched a scathing attack on 30 years of multiculturalism in Britain, warning that it fostered extremist ideology and directly contributed to home-grown Islamic terrorism.

Some friendly, peace-loving British Muslims

Signaling a radical departure from the strategies of previous governments, Cameron said that Britain must adopt a policy of “muscular liberalism” to enforce the values of equality, law, and freedom of speech across all parts of society.

He warned Muslim groups that if they failed to endorse women’s rights or promote integration, they would lose all government funding. All immigrants to Britain were expected to speak English, and schools to teach the country’s common culture.

He called for an end to the “passive tolerance” of divided communities and said members of all faiths must integrate into wider society and accept core values.[7]

His damning verdict came just months after German Chancellor Angela Merkel said that multiculturalism in Germany had failed.

Merkel said the so-called “Multikulti” concept – where people would be “living side-by-side” happily – did not work, and immigrants needed to do more to integrate – including learning German.

In her speech in Potsdam, Merkel said that the approach to build a multicultural society “has failed, utterly failed.”[8]

The comments come amid rising anti-immigration sentiment in Germany.

The debate first heated up in August 2010, when Thilo Sarrazin, a senior official at Germany’s central bank and a member of the country’s left-of-centre Social Democratic Party, said that “no immigrant group other than Muslims is so strongly connected with claims on the welfare state and crime.”[9]

Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy joined the European leaders in condemning multiculturalism as a failure.

He told the French people: “We have been too concerned about the identity of the person who was arriving and not enough about the identity of the country that was receiving him.”

The president made the declaration in a television debate after being asked if the policy of encouraging the religious and cultural differences of immigrants was not working.

He told viewers: “My answer is clearly yes, it is a failure.”

He said, “If you come to France, you accept to melt into a single community, which is the national community, and if you do not want to accept that, you cannot be welcome in France.”[10]

France’s Muslim-controlled, no-go areas

France has some 751 no-go zones. The French government labels them “sensitive urban zones.”[11] In reality, they are areas dangerous to whites and non-Muslims who enter. Some of the no-go zones function like microstates and are governed by sharia law.

A leading French intellectual says that no-go zones are areas where the police don’t go, the firemen don’t go, and even the doctors and ambulances don’t go, except if they have no other choice. He says that these parts of France are in the hands of drug-traffickers, gangs, and imams.

Fabrice Balanche, a well-known French Islamic scholar who teaches at the University of Lyon, in an interview with Radio Télévision Suisse, declared: “We have territories in France such as Roubaix, such as northern Marseille, where Police will not set foot, where the authority of the State is completely absent and where mini Islamic states have been formed.”[12]

French writer and political journalist Éric Zemmour, when interviewed on BFM TV, said: “There are places in France today, especially in the suburbs, where it is not really in France.

Muslims block Paris street for Friday prayers

“Salafi Islamists are Islamising some neighborhoods and some suburbs. In these neighborhoods, it’s not France; it’s an Islamic republic.” In a separate interview, Zemmour – whose latest book is entitled The French Suicide[13] – says multiculturalism and the reign of politically-correct speech are destroying the country.[14]

French politician Franck Guiot wrote that parts of Évry, a township in the southern suburbs of Paris, are no-go zones where police forces cannot go for fear of being attacked. He said that politicians seeking to maintain “social peace” were prohibiting the police from carrying weapons to defend themselves.[15]

Even the Socialist mayor of Amiens, Gilles Demailly, has referred to the Fafet-Brossolette district of Paris as a “no-go zone” where “you can no longer order a pizza or get a doctor to come to the house.”

Europe 1, a leading broadcaster in France, has referred to Marseille as a “no-go zone” after the government was forced to deploy riot police, known as the CRS, to confront warring Muslim gangs in the city.

The French Interior Ministry, in a media release on July 31, 2013, said it was trying to “reclaim” 184 square kilometers of Marseille that have come under the control of Muslim law.[16]

The French newspaper Le Figaro referred to downtown Perpignan as a “veritable no-go zone” where “aggression, antisocial behavior, drug trafficking, Muslim communalism, racial tension and tribal violence” are forcing non-Muslims to move out.

Le Figaro also reported that the Les Izards district of Toulouse was likewise a no-go zone, where Arab drug-trafficking gangs rule the streets in a climate of fear.

Muslims riot in Sarcelle, north of Paris credit AP

Separately, Le Figaro reported that large quantities of assault rifles are circulating in French no-go zones. “For a few hundred dollars you can buy Kalashnikovs,” political scientist Sebastian Roché said, “the price of an iPhone!”[17]

The newspaper France Soir published poll results showing that 60 percent of French citizens are now in favor of deploying the army into troubled suburbs to restore order.

The newspaper Le Parisien has called parts of Grigny, a township in the southern suburbs of Paris, a “lawless zone” plagued by well-organized Muslim gangs, whose members believe they are “masters of the world.”[18]

The weekly news magazine Le Point reported on the “spiraling Muslim lawlessness” in the French city of Grenoble.

The French magazine L’Obs (previously known as Le Nouvel Observateur) has reported on the deteriorating security situation in Roubaix, a city in northern France that is located close to the Belgian border. The magazine reported that local citizens are “exiled within their own country” and want to create their own militia to restore order because police are too afraid to confront Muslim gangs.[19]

In August 2014, the French magazine Valeurs Actuelles (Contemporary Values) reported that “France has more than 750 areas of lawlessness” where the law of the French Republic no longer applies.[20]

Under the headline “Hell in France,” the magazine said that many parts of France are experiencing a “dictatorship of Islamic riffraff” where police are “greeted by mortar fire” and are “forced to retreat amid flying projectiles.”

Separately, Valeurs Actuelles reported on the lawlessness in Trappes, a township located in the western suburbs of Paris, where radical Islam and endemic crime go hand in hand. “Criminals are pursued by Islamic fundamentalists to impose an alternative society, breaking links with the French Republic,” according to local police commander Mohammed Duhan. It is not advisable to go there, he says, adding, “You will be spotted by so-called chauffeurs (lookouts for drug-traffickers) and be stripped and beaten.”

Valeurs Actuelles has also reported on no-go zones in Nantes, Tours and Orléans, which have turned into “battlefields,” where remaining native French holdouts are confronted with “Muslim communalism, the disappearance of their culture and rampant crime.”

In October 2011, a landmark 2,200-page report, Banlieue de la République (“Suburbs of the Republic”)[21] found that Seine-Saint-Denis and other Parisian suburbs are becoming “separate Islamic societies” cut off from the French state, and where Islamic sharia law is rapidly displacing French civil law. The report said that Muslim immigrants are increasingly rejecting French values and instead are immersing themselves in radical Islam.

The report – which was commissioned by the influential French think tank, L’Institut Montaigne – was directed by Gilles Kepel, a highly respected political scientist and specialist in Islam, together with five other French researchers.

The authors of the report found that France – which now has 6.5 million Muslims (the largest Muslim population in European Union) – is on the brink of a major social explosion because of the failure of Muslims to integrate into French society.

The report also found that the problem is being exacerbated by radical Muslim preachers, who are promoting the social marginalization of Muslim immigrants in order to create a parallel Muslim society in France, ruled by sharia law.

French journalist and author Alexandre del Valle declares that the situation will lead to civil war.[22]

Zones in major European cities controlled by criminal Muslim gangs and sharia law

France is not alone. Brussels, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Berlin – indeed, most large European cities – have these “no-go” areas, where the law of the land does not apply. Instead, sharia law is firmly in control. The no-go areas share three characteristics:

1)   All are largely populated by unemployed, unemployable and un-integrated Muslim migrants from Africa and the Middle East and their descendants;

2)   All are blighted by organized crime, with the narcotics trade, associated violence, and prostitution dominating the civic landscape;

3)   All have connections with, and supply, recruits for jihadi activities overseas and at home, offering a shelter, safe haven and breeding ground for organized crime and politically motivated terror.

The previous non-migrant, non-Muslim residents, have mostly been squeezed out by threats, violence (real or implied), intimidation, crime and plummeting property values. Non-Muslim women, not wearing street clothes in accordance with sharia law, are routinely and openly accosted, insulted, and manhandled by the self-proclaimed sharia patrols or Islamic purity enthusiasts.

The generous social security benefits paid to the residents of these suburbs are regarded as jizya – a head tax[23] – on dhimmis (non-Muslims residents in an Islamic land).[24] These benefits are treated as an entitlement. This approach helps resolve the theological conundrum, which states that Muslims should not live in lands ruled by non-Muslims. Being paid jizya establishes the hierarchy of primacy and subjugation, justifies the contempt and disregard towards local laws and customs and supports the notion that the present situation is a transition towards full control.

Local police, ambulance, and fire brigades are not game to enter Muslim-controlled areas. If they do, the likely outcome is violence or, at best, intimidation and contempt. The French police have a long-standing non-written arrangement with these areas’ crime leaders not to disturb their activities within the specified areas in exchange for the containment of illegal activities outside.

These areas of Europe have an acknowledged pool of terrorist sympathizers, activists, recruiters and practitioners, who can offer help and succor in a time of need. Germany, Belgium and other Western European and Scandinavian countries face similar problems. Molenbeek, Forest, and Schaerbeek in Brussels, Saint-Denis in Paris, Neukolln in Berlin, Rinkeby and Husby in Stockholm, Tingbjerg in Copenhagen – all are now centers of organized crime, as well as havens for the perpetrators of recent terrorist atrocities in Europe.

The areas of compact immigrant settlement are virtually a terra incognita for authorities, because they are ruled, in effect, by organized crime. Such structures are ideally suited for the purposes of terrorist organizations such as the Islamic State, which has ready-made access to recruits, safe houses and material, plus spiritual and logistical support. Due to the overwhelming majority of residents in these areas being Muslim, Islamic terrorists can dissolve within the benevolent and ideologically close community, becoming urban guerrillas.

Muslim enclaves in European cities are also breeding grounds for Islamic radicalism and pose a significant threat to Western security.

Europe’s no-go zones are the by-product of decades of multicultural policies that have encouraged Muslim immigrants to create parallel societies and remain segregated from – rather than integrated into – their European host nations.

The problem of no-go zones is well documented, but multiculturalists and their politically correct supporters vehemently deny that they exist. Some are now engaged in a concerted campaign to discredit and even silence those who draw attention to the issue.

UK poll reveals British Muslim community is becoming a “separate nation within a nation”

Many British Muslims do not share the values of their non-Muslim compatriots, and say they want to lead separate lives under Islamic sharia law, according to the findings of a 2016 survey.

The poll – which shows that a significant part of the British Muslim community is becoming a separate “nation within a nation” – has reignited the long-running debate about the failure of 30 years of British multiculturalism and the need for stronger measures to promote Muslim integration.

The survey was conducted by ICM Research for the Channel 4 documentary, “What British Muslims Really Think,” which aired on April 13, 2016.[25]

The 615-page survey found that more than 100,000 British Muslims sympathized with suicide-bombers and people who commit other terrorist acts. Moreover, only one in three British Muslims (34 percent) would contact the police if they believed that somebody close to them had become involved with jihadists.

In addition, 23 percent of British Muslims said Islamic sharia law should replace British law in areas with large Muslim populations.

British Muslims are becoming a nation within a nation, the former chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has warned.[26]

Commenting on the ground-breaking survey, Trevor Phillips said we are “in danger of sacrificing a generation of young British people to values that are antithetical to the beliefs of most of us, including many Muslims.”

He called for a new, tougher approach to integration and the abandonment of “the failed policy of multiculturalism.”

The survey had made “one truly terrifying” conclusion that “Muslims who have separatist views about how they want to live in Britain are far more likely to support terrorism than those who do not”, added Mr. Phillips, who ran the EHRC until 2012 and was previously in charge of the Commission for Racial Equality.

Multiculturalism’s greatest evil has been the opening of the floodgates of Muslim immigration into Western countries, thus giving Islam a foothold in these countries, enabling its goal of implementing sharia law via its “stealth jihad.”

Multiculturalism and political correctness to blame for the tragedy of Rotherham

Over 1,400 British girls, some as young as 11, were groomed, sexually exploited, raped, beaten and trafficked, for more than 16 years in one English town

A story of rampant child abuse – ignored and abetted by the police – emerged out of the British town of Rotherham, Yorkshire, in August 2014. Until then, its scale and scope would have been inconceivable in a civilized country.

Its origins, however, lie in two related factors: first, what one Labour MP called “not wanting to rock the multicultural boat,” and, secondly, the fear by police, council authorities and social workers of being branded as racist.

The Labour council of Rotherham stands accused of ignoring child sex abuse on an unimaginable scale for 16 years.

Children (almost all were white British girls), some as young as 11, were trafficked, beaten and raped by large numbers of Pakistani Muslim men in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, the council-commissioned review into child protection revealed.

At least 1,400 children were subjected to appalling sexual exploitation in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013, the report found.

Children as young as 11 were raped by multiple perpetrators, abducted, trafficked to other cities in England, beaten and intimidated, it said.

And, shockingly, more than a third of the cases were already known to agencies.

But, according to the report’s author, “several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought racist.”

Professor Alexis Jay, who wrote the report, released in August 2014, condemned the “blatant” collective failures by the council’s leadership, concluding: “It is hard to describe the appalling nature of the abuse that child victims suffered.”[27]

Perhaps we can make a start by looking at what Denis MacShane, the former Labour MP for Rotherham, admitted upon the publication of Professor Jay’s report.

He hadn’t said anything at the time, he said, because “as a true Guardian reader and liberal Leftie,” he hadn’t wanted to rock the multicultural boat.[28]

The landmark report exposed widespread failures of the council, police and social services.

The inquiry team noted fears among council staff of being labeled “racist” if they focused on victims’ descriptions of the majority of abusers as “Asian” men.

Professor Jay said: “No-one knows the true scale of child sexual exploitation in Rotherham over the years. Our conservative estimate is that approximately 1,400 children were sexually exploited over the full inquiry period, from 1997 to 2013.”

Revealing details of the inquiry’s findings, Jay said: “It is hard to describe the appalling nature of the abuse that child victims suffered.”

Child victims doused in petrol

The inquiry team found examples of “children who had been doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight, threatened with guns, made to witness brutally violent rapes and threatened they would be next if they told anyone.”

Five men from the town were jailed for sexual offenses against girls in 2010, but the report said police “regarded many child victims with contempt.”

The report found: “Several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”

Failures by those charged with protecting children happened despite three reports between 2002 and 2006, which both the council and police were aware of, and “which could not have been clearer in the description of the situation in Rotherham.”

Professor Jay said the first of these reports was “effectively suppressed” because senior officers did not believe the data. The other two were ignored, she said.

The inquiry team found that in the early 2000s when a group of professionals attempted to monitor a number of children believed to be at risk, “managers gave little help or support to their efforts.”

Rotherham teenage mother, Laura Wilson, was brutally murdered by her Muslim lover, Ashtiaq Ashgar, for exposing their secret relationship to his family and bringing shame on the traditional Pakistani Muslim family. Ashgar had sworn Laura to secrecy because he was just using her for sex while his family were planning an arranged marriage for their son with a girl from Pakistan.

The report revealed some people at a senior level in the police and children’s social care thought the extent of the problem was being “exaggerated.”

Jay said: “The authorities involved have a great deal to answer for.”

The report estimates 1,400 children were sexually exploited over 16 years, with one young person telling the report’s author that gang rape was a usual part of growing up in Rotherham.

Professor Jay’s report describes the abuse as “appalling” and says it included the rape of girls as young as 11 by “large numbers of male perpetrators.”

Children were raped by multiple attackers, trafficked to other towns and cities in the north of England, abducted, beaten and intimidated, the report revealed.

The lack of reports was partly down to a fear of being racist, Professor Jay wrote, as the majority of the perpetrators were described as “Asian men,” and many were said to be of Pakistani origin.

The spotlight fell on Rotherham in 2010, after Laura Wilson, 17, was murdered for bringing shame on the families of two Pakistani Muslim men who had used her for sex.

It was later revealed that social workers had known for six years that the white teenage mother was at clear risk from predatory Asian gangs, and had received information about certain adults suspected of targeting her from the age of 11.

Laura, 17, had been groomed by a string of British Muslim Pakistanis before she was stabbed and thrown into a canal to die for informing her abusers’ families of the sexual relationships.[29]

When Laura Wilson exposed their secret affair to his family, Ashtiaq Ashgar decided to carry out what has been described as Britain’s first white honor killing. Ashgar lured Laura to a canal where he stabbed her and threw her into the canal.

Her killer, Ashtiaq Asghar, who was 18 at the time, was given a life sentence and will serve a minimum of 17½ years after he pleaded guilty to murdering Laura in October 2010.

Asghar was furious after the young mother revealed details of their sexual relationship to his Muslim family, and was on “a mission to kill,” the court was told.

He exchanged a series of texts with married friend and mentor Ishaq Hussain, 22, who also had an affair with Laura, and whom the judge described as a man who regarded white girls as “sexual targets, not human beings.”

In one message, sent a day before he killed Laura, Asghar wrote: “I’m gonna send that kuffar (non-Muslim) bitch straight to Hell.”[30]

In May 2011 at Ashtiaq’s trial, the court heard how after stabbing Laura, he threw her into the canal but she kept fighting for her life. A pathologist report found that the stab wounds to the head were actually done to keep her under the water.

Ashgar was sentenced to seventeen-and-a-half years imprisonment. “He showed no remorse, just upset at the time he got in jail,” said Laura’s mother after he was sentenced.

In 2012, the council’s Safeguarding Children Board published a serious case review; but key passages, which reveal they knew she was at particular risk from “Asian men,” had been blocked out with black lines.

The uncensored report confirms that Laura, identified as Child S, had dealings with 15 agencies, and identified “numerous missed opportunities” to protect her.

It states that she eventually became “almost invisible” to care professionals.

One girl, known only as “Jessica,” claims she was abused daily as a 14-year-old by a 24-year-old man after social services failed to accept that she was a victim of grooming.

Archid, Baharat and Bannaras, the three Muslim brothers
who “owned” Rotherham

On one occasion, married father-of-two, Arshid Hussain, was even caught with the half-naked schoolgirl under his bed, but documents revealed that police arrested her – and let him go.

While this report is right in criticizing how blame has too often in the past been ascribed just to “Asians,” it is itself too casual in blaming Islam or even Pakistanis in general. Part of the problem is that many of the culprits are of Pashtun tribal stock from Kashmir, regarded as “trouble,” even by many Muslims and Pakistanis.

Ringleader of Rotherham child sex-grooming gang jailed for 35 years

Some of the first convictions following the Jay report occurred in March 2016, with six people convicted and sentenced for what the judge called an “appalling catalog of offending.”[31]

The ringleader of a gang that caused damage of “unimaginable proportions” by grooming, raping and abusing young teenage girls in Rotherham was jailed for 35 years.

Six members of the gang led by Arshid Hussain were sentenced to a total of 103 years for an “appalling catalog of offending,” that saw them abuse and threaten vulnerable girls with impunity, and pass them around as sex objects.

Arshid Hussain, Basharat Hussain and Banaras Hussain, the three Muslim brothers who “owned” Rotherham, were sentenced to long jail terms.

Three brothers, Arshid, Basharat and Banaras Hussain – known as Mad Ash, Bash and Bono – formed a violent, gun-toting, drug-dealing family who appeared to operate with impunity in the South Yorkshire town, a court heard.

The victims had each suffered “immense psychological harm,” Judge Sarah Wright told Sheffield Crown Court, while the effect on their families and community had been devastating.

Women described how they were raped, beaten and passed between abusers, and used as prostitutes by a gang led by the three men, who “owned” Rotherham.

The abused women described how they were targeted in their young teens and subjected to brutal treatment as they were passed around to men who raped and beat them.

Some of the victims said they were trafficked, locked up, physically assaulted and threatened with death.

Another victim, now 33, said she thought she was going to die when her hands and feet were tied, and she had petrol poured over her. A woman, now 36, explained how she was abused from the age of 11, with Arshid passing her on to his brother and friends, often as “payment” for debts.

One girl said the Hussain brothers “owned” Rotherham, while another told the jury, “The police gave them a free card to do what they wanted.”

One police officer was even named by a victim who said he was actually having sex with girls involved in the exploitation.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) is now involved in 55 ongoing investigations into “allegations about how South Yorkshire Police dealt with child sexual exploitation in Rotherham.”

The commission said these investigations cover a range of allegations, from a failure to act on reported child sexual exploitation to corruption. The IPCC said it is undertaking “ongoing research and analysis work” into more than 194 allegations made by 41 complainants to date. While 92 of the allegations relate to police officers who have been identified, 102 involve as yet unidentified officers.

It said 54 officers have been named to date – 26 of these have been advised that they are the subject of an investigation, that, if proven, would amount to misconduct, and the remaining 28 are subject to ongoing assessment. During the trial, one woman who spent three days describing how she was repeatedly abused and assaulted from the age of 11, stated to the jury that she told a detective called Kenneth Dawes about what happened, but no action was taken.

She alleged: “He used to have sex with girls and he used to take drugs from people and pass them on to Ash.”

Amazingly, in one case, the police even took the fight to the abused child. A 13-year-old girl “was found” by the police at 3 am – in a semi-derelict house, alone with a large group of adult males. She was drunk, the result of having been supplied with alcohol, and there was evidence that her clothing had been disrupted.

She alone was arrested for a public order offense, detained, prosecuted, and appeared before the Youth Court, where she received a Referral Order for which the court arranged “reparation,” drug and alcohol counseling, art psychotherapy and victim awareness sessions.

What a wonderful example of crime-busting! It would be interesting to know what those “victim awareness sessions” were about.

Incredibly, there’s a suggestion that the Pakistani abusers were seen as the victims of the abused child, a point confirmed by a reference in the report about the police: “The sense was that if there had been any offense it had been by the girls, for luring the men in.” Those Pakistani abusers must have thought they were in paradise.

Fear of appearing racist trumped fears of more children being abused. Not only were negligent officials not prosecuted, they prospered. Shaun Wright, a former Labour councilor who was in charge of Rotherham children’s services during the five-year period wherein a blind eye was turned to the worst case of mass child abuse in British history, is now South Yorkshire’s Police and Crime Commissioner.

It’s impossible not to share the British public’s incredulous fury. Powerless white working-class girls were caught between a hateful, imported culture of vicious misogyny on the one hand, and on the other, a culture of chauvinism among the police, who regarded them as worthless slags. Officials trained in diversity and political correctness failed to acknowledge what was effectively white slavery on their doorstep. It was much too embarrassing to concede that it wasn’t white people who were committing racist hate crimes in this instance.

Equally horrifying is the suggestion that certain Pakistani councilors asked social workers to reveal the addresses of the shelters where some of the abused girls were hiding.

Front-line youth workers who submitted reports in 2002, 2003 and 2006 expressing their alarm at the scale of the child sex-offending, say that the town hall told them to keep quiet about the ethnicity of the perpetrators in the interests of “community cohesion.”

Thanks to Professor Jay, it has been stated publicly for the first time that the fear of appearing racist was more pressing in official minds than enforcing the law of the land or rescuing terrified children. It is one of the greatest scandals of our lifetime.

This will come as no comfort to the 1,400 brutalized girls, many of whom have self-harmed or committed suicide, but the Rotherham tragedy may be the final nail in the coffin of multiculturalism in Britain.

Rotherham just the tip of the iceberg

Although the avalanche of revelations about what had been going on in Rotherham for 16 years is hard to stomach, these revelations reflect only one part of what has become the most horrifying scandal in modern Britain.

As was documented in ‘Easy Meat’: Multiculturalism, Islam and Child Sex Slavery,[32] a March 2014 report from the Law and Freedom Foundation, similar tragedies have long been unfolding in towns and cities across the land, where, with the full connivance of social workers and the police, the criminal abuse of underage girls (many in state “care”), has been organized by largely Pakistani gangs of men on an industrial scale. It has then been covered up systematically by the very people who should have been intervening – council officials, police and politicians. For fear of being called “racist,” police forces across the country have buried the evidence.

Some estimates indicate that as many as 100,000 schoolgirls may have fallen victim to these gangs, while other estimates are even higher.[33]

Child sex abuse gangs could have assaulted up to one million young girls, says Rotherham MP.

In an interview with the Daily Mirror on February 5, 2015, Rotherham’s Labour MP, Sarah Champion, described child sexual exploitation as a “national disaster.” She said:

The day after the first report broke the victims started coming to me. They couldn’t go to the police, they couldn’t go to the council. So who do you go to?

For the first three weeks I generally thought I was losing my mind. I nearly lost my mind because of the level of depravity and horror.

Listening to what these, now women, had gone through and how they were just left discarded, to flounder on their own.

It was utterly mind-blowing and then the problem I had was that I was getting new cases coming to me, ones that hadn’t been reported which they wanted me to report. But I didn’t know who I could trust in the police to report it.

I generally thought I was getting close to having a nervous breakdown because I couldn’t process these two worlds going on and that anybody in a professional capacity would not have acted about what was going on. It’s obscene.[34]

Talking about her concerns of corruption within the police force, she pointed out that the IPCC had suspended 14 police officers within a month of launching their investigation.

Talking of the incidents she has encountered, she told of one horrific case in which a girl from Rotherham was traced to a terraced street in Blackpool by youth worker Jane Senior, whom she employs.

“She knew where the girl was because of the queue of men down the street and up the stairs,” the MP said.

“There are hundreds of thousands and I think there could be up to a million victims of exploitation nationwide, including right now. Girls in the process of being groomed”, she said.

“It’s seriously a nationwide issue.”[35]

The sex-grooming gangs and the cover-ups represent one of the worst child-care scandals in British history.

The schoolgirls and their families were failed by thousands of professionals who were supposed to take care of children. Child-protection laws were made to play a subservient role to maintaining the doctrine of multiculturalism. A climate of fear was fostered by the Left’s agenda of political correctness.

The schoolgirls were abandoned and sacrificed for the doctrine of multiculturalism.

The narrative of racism has held such sway in Britain for the past 30 years that it has enabled the Muslim sex-slave gangs to operate with virtual impunity. It was the accusations of “racism,” and the fear of what it could do to the careers of social workers, council officials and police officers, which were used to silence all discussion of the Muslim grooming gangs.

Sex slavery in Europe

The scourge of Muslim sax slavery is not confined to Britain. The Dutch media have been reporting on it since 2001. To show that the common factor is not ethnicity but Islam, at least 40 per cent of the perpetrators in the Netherlands are Muslims of Moroccan descent, with most of the others from the Dutch Antilles, the Dominican Republic and Turkey.[36] In a November 23, 2012, Daily Mail article, journalist Sue Reid reported:

In a chilling parallel to the scandal sweeping Britain’s towns and cities, where a multitude of girls have been lured into sex-for-sale rings run by gangs, the Dutch pimps search out girls at school gates and in cafés, posing as “boyfriends” promising romance, fast car rides and restaurant meals.

The men ply their victims with vodka and drugs. They tell them lies: that they love them and their families don’t care for them. Then, the trap set, they rape them with other gang members, often taking photos of the attack to blackmail the girl into submission.

Befuddled, frightened and too ashamed to tell parents or teachers, the girls are cynically isolated from their old lives and swept into prostitution.

The men in the gangs are dubbed – incongruously – “lover boys”, because of their distinct modus operandi of making girls fall in love with them before forcing them into prostitution at private flats or houses all over Holland, and in the window brothels. The lover boy phenomenon has appalled Dutch society, not least because of the sheer numbers of girls involved.[37]

Lodewijk Asscher, 38, a leading politician, says of the gangs: “Hard-line criminal behavior is happening behind those windows. Girls are physically abused if they don’t work hard enough. It is slavery, which was abolished a long time ago in the Netherlands.”[38]

In 2011, 242 “loverboy” crimes were investigated by police, half of them involving the forced prostitution of girls under the age of 18. Campaigner Anita de Wit says this is a fraction, “one percent,” of the true number. “There are thousands of girls being preyed on by male gangs in Holland,” she said.[39]

The German newspaper, Der Spiegel, in its online edition, under the headline, “Schoolgirls controlled by loverboys: Maths class in the morning, turning tricks at lunchtime,” tells the harrowing stories of Angelique, forced into prostitution at age 15, and Maria pimped by a “loverboy” at the age of 12:

He picked her up after school, gave her marijuana, prostituted her to johns during her free periods, and made sure that she was back in class on time and was always present to take important tests. He was making sure that no one would notice anything.[40]

So much for the warm and fuzzy feelings that the concepts of multiculturalism and political correctness generate in the hearts of the leftists and progressives.

 

[1]       Douglas Murray, The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam (London: Bloomsbury, 2017), p. 20.

[2]       Tom Bower, Broken Vows: Tony Blair – The Tragedy of Power (London: Faber & Faber, 2016).

James Slack, “Tony Blair biography reveals PM’s conspiracy to silence immigration debate”, Daily Mail (UK), February 27, 2016.
URL: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3466485/How-Blair-cynically-let-two-million-migrants-Explosive-biography-reveals-PM-s-conspiracy-silence-immigration-debate.html

[3]       See Chapter 7, “The Enemy Within”, above.

[4]       Charles Sykes and K.L. Billingsley, “How the Ford Foundation created multiculturalism”, FrontPage Magazine, January 9, 2004.
URL: http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=14647

[5]       Keith Moore, “Grassby crimes cover-up”, Herald Sun (Melbourne), May 9, 2005. This article has now disappeared from the Internet. However, a number of articles refer to it, including: “Mafia influence and the Whitlam government”, National Observer: Australia and World Affairs, No. 65, June-August 2005.
URL: www.nationalobserver.net/2005_winter_ed1.htm

[6]       An idea of the extent and influence of the multicultural industry in Australia can be gauged from the Federation of Ethnic Communities’ Councils of Australia (FECCA) Annual Report 2015-16.
URL: http://fecca.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/2509-FECCA_Annual-Report_Web-FA_optimised.pdf

[7]       Oliver Wright and Jerome Taylor, “Cameron: My war on multiculturalism”, The Independent (UK), December 15, 2010.
URL: www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/cameron-my-war-on-multiculturalism-2205074.html

[8]       Allan Hall, “Germany has ‘utterly failed’ to build multicultural society”, The Telegraph (UK), October 17, 2010.
URL: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/8069365/Germany-has-utterly-failed-to-build-multicultural-society.html

[9]       Thilo Sarrazin quoted in Benjamin Weinthal, “Why are Germans upset over critic of Islam?”, Jerusalem Post, September 2, 2010.
URL: www.jpost.com/International/Comment-Why-are-Germans-upset-over-critic-of-Islam

Sarrazin has also written two books on this topic: Deutschland schafft sich ab [Germany Abolishes Itself] (2010) and Wunschdenken [Wishful Thinking]. (2016).

[10]     “Nicolas Sarkozy joins David Cameron and Angela Merkel view that multiculturalism has failed”, Daily Mail (UK), February 12, 2011.
URL: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1355961/Nicolas-Sarkozy-joins-David-Cameron-Angela-Merkel-view-multiculturalism-failed.html

[11]     “Atlas des Zones urbaines sensibles (Zus)”, Geographic Information System of Town Politics, General Commission for Territorial Equality (CGET), Paris.
URL: http://sig.ville.gouv.fr/atlas/ZUS/

[12]     “Des ‘mini états islamiques’ en France”, AgoraVox, French citizen-journalism website, September 30, 2014.
URL: www.agoravox.tv/tribune-libre/article/des-mini-etats-islamiques-en-46961

[13]     Éric Zemmour, Le Suicide Français: Ces Quarante Années qui ont Défait la France (Paris: Éditions Albin Michel, 2014).

[14]     “Eric Zemmour: L’invité de Ruth Elkrief”, BFM TV (Paris), October 8, 2014.
URL: www.bfmtv.com/mediaplayer/video/eric-zemmour-l-invitac-de-ruth-elkrief-0810-328914.html

[15]     Franck Guiot, “[Tribune] Corbeil-Essonnes, une zone de non-droit parmi tant d’autres sous l’emprise de la racaille”, Novopress (France), October 21, 2014.
URL: http://fr.novopress.info/177064/tribune-corbeil-essonnes-une-zone-de-non-droit-parmi-tant-dautres-sous-lemprise-de-la-racaille/

[16]     “Clarification sur les ZSP à Marseille”, media release of the French Minister of the Interior, July 31, 2013.
URL: www.interieur.gouv.fr/Archives/Archives-presse/Communiques-de-presse/Clarification-sur-les-ZSP-a-Marseille

[17]     Patrice de Méritens, “Dans les zones de non-droit, la situation se durcit”, Le Figaro (Paris), July 23, 2010.
URL: www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2010/07/24/01016-20100724ARTFIG00097-dans-les-zones-de-non-droit-la-situation-se-durcit.php

[18]     “Grigny: une cité sous le joug des petits caïds”, Le Parisien, February 4, 2011.
URL: www.leparisien.fr/grigny-91350/grigny-une-cite-sous-le-joug-des-petits-caids-04-02-2011-1299002.php

[19]     Soeren Kern, “European ‘no-go’ zones: fact or fiction? Part 1: France”, Gatestone Institute (New York), January 20, 2015.
URL: www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5128/france-no-go-zones

[20]     Raphaël Stainville, “Dossier: L’enfer en France”, Valeurs Actuelles (Paris), August 25, 2014.
URL: www.valeursactuelles.com/societe/dossier-lenfer-en-france-47363

[21]     “Banlieue de la République: Une enquête de terrain à Clichy-sous-Bois / Montfermeil, un débat, des propositions pour les quartiers en France”, a 2,200-page report, L’Institut Montaigne (Paris ), October 2011.
URL: www.banlieue-de-la-republique.fr

[22]     Dale Hurd, “Europe’s multiculturalism leading to civil war?”, CBN News (Christian Broadcasting Network, Virginia Beach, Virginia), March 13, 2011.
URL: www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2011/february/europes-multiculturalism-leading-to-civil-war-/

[23]     Mark Durie, The Third Choice: Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom (Melbourne: Deror Books, 2010).

William Kilpatrick, “Submission”, Crisis Magazine (USA), September 18, 2017.
URL: www.crisismagazine.com/2017/submission

[24]     A dhimmi is a person who is a non-Muslim in a Muslim-dominated society, and as such has subordinate legal status. The creation of the dhimmi status was a way to offer protection to the infidel in exchange for fees or taxes.

[25]     “ICM Muslims survey for Channel 4”, ICM Unlimited (London), April 11, 2016.
URL: www.icmunlimited.com/polls/icm-muslims-survey-for-channel-4/

[26]     David Barrett, “British Muslims becoming a nation within a nation, Trevor Phillips warns”, The Telegraph (UK), April 11, 2016.
URL: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/10/uk-muslim-ghettoes-warning/

[27]     Alexis Jay OBE, “Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham (1997–2013)”, Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council (South Yorkshire, UK), August 2014.
URL: www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/1407/independent_inquiry_cse_in_rotherham

“Rotherham child abuse scandal: 1,400 children exploited, report finds”, BBC News, August 26, 2014.
URL: www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-28939089

[28]     Helen Pidd, “Rotherham report ‘reduced me to tears’, says MP who exposed abuse decade ago”, The Guardian (UK), August 31, 2014.
URL: www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/aug/30/rotherham-girls-could-have-been-spared-ann-cryer

[29]     Daniel Miller, “Social workers hid fact they knew teenage mother was at risk from sex grooming gangs”, Daily Mail (UK), June 7, 2012.
URL: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2155823/social-workers-hid-fact-knew-teenage-mother-risk-sex-grooming-gangs-six-years-brutally-murdered.html

[30]     Ibid.

[31]     Lisa O’Carroll, “Ringleader of Rotherham child sexual abuse gang jailed for 35 years”, The Guardian (UK), February 27, 2016.
URL: www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/26/three-brothers-jailed-over-rotherham-child-sexual-abuse

Staff writer, “Guilty: Mad Ash, Bash and Bono – gun-toting, grooming family who ‘owned’ Rotherham”, Yorkshire Post, February 24, 2016.
URL: www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/crime/guilty-mad-ash-bash-and-bono-gun-toting-grooming-family-who-owned-rotherham-1-7746366

Ben Farmer, “Rotherham abuse trial: Three brothers among six guilty of child sex exploitation”, The Telegraph (UK), February 24, 2016.
URL: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/12172189/Rotherham-abuse-trial-six-guilty-of-child-sex-exploitation.html

[32]     Peter McLoughlin, ‘Easy Meat’: Multiculturalism, Islam and Child Sex Slavery (UK: Law and Freedom Foundation, March 2014).
URL: www.mensenhandelweb.nl/system/files/documents/08 feb 2016/Easy-Meat-Multiculturalism-Islam-and-Child-Sex-Slavery-05-03-2014.pdf

[33]     Ibid., p. 204.

[34]     Lucy Thornton, “Child sex abuse gangs could have assaulted one million youngsters in the UK”, Daily Mirror (UK), February 5, 2015.
URL: www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/child-sex-abuse-gangs-could-5114029

[35]     Ibid.

[36]     McLoughlin, ‘Easy Meat’, op. cit., p. 45.

[37]     Sue Reid, “Why Amsterdam’s legal brothels are a brutal lesson for Britain about telling the truth on sex gangs and race”, Daily Mail (UK), November 23, 2012.
URL: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2237170/Why-Amsterdams-legal-brothels-lesson-Britain-telling-truth-sex-gangs-race.html

[38]     Ibid.

[39]     Ibid.

[40]     Dialika Krahe, “Schoolgirls controlled by loverboys: Math class in the morning, turning tricks at lunchtime”, Der Spiegel (Hamburg), July 9, 2010.
URL: www.spiegel.de/international/europe/schoolgirls-controlled-by-loverboys-math-class-in-the-morning-turning-tricks-at-lunchtime-a-705104-2.html

Chapter 9: The Dangers of Multiculturalism

[i]       Tom Whitehead, “Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser”, The Telegraph (UK), October 23, 2009.
URL: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html

[ii]       Andrew Neather, “Don’t listen to the whingers – London needs immigrants”, Evening Standard (UK), October 23, 2009.
URL: www.standard.co.uk/news/dont-listen-to-the-whingers-london-needs-immigrants-6786170.html